CPAPtalk.com

palerider wrote:

mike1953 wrote: Someone woke up with a bad attitude today or is it everyday after reading several of your other posts. IMHO!

hey, ems, why aren't you bitching this guy out for being a wanker?

Wait...I didn't get the wanker blast? COOL!!

Tatooed Lady wrote:

palerider wrote:

mike1953 wrote: Someone woke up with a bad attitude today or is it everyday after reading several of your other posts. IMHO!

hey, ems, why aren't you bitching this guy out for being a wanker?

Wait...I didn't get the wanker blast? COOL!!

well, as far as I'm aware, you haven't *acted* like a wanker yet...

just somewhat snarky, but I'm good with that

JimP wrote:Some surely are idiots but I'd wager that many are misinformed.

Agree. We sometimes forget that we're not a representative sample of sleep apnea patients. Many who come here are shocked by the information that they did not receive from their health care providers.

Indeed, we are not typical. More's the pity.

chunkyfrog wrote:Indeed, we are not typical. More's the pity.

I agree, I'd love to be green and hoppy!

It is logical for a money-based medical system to draw a line in the sand and to say, 'If you use the machine less than this amount, we will refuse to pay for it.'

The mistake would be for anyone to look at that line in the sand and to assume that it actually means, 'If I only use my machine that amount, I am getting full benefit from it.'

Those are two very, very different--indeed, unrelated--thoughts/assumptions.