JohnBFisher wrote:CapnLoki wrote:... Remember, the load almost doubles when using the "inverter - AC supply" setup ...
That is only true if you have a VERY old inverter or a pure sine wave inverter. If you have a "Modified" sine wave inverter the loss is MUCH less (around 5 to 10% at the most).
So this comment has haunted me for a while. I've always taken it as axiomatic that a direct 12V supply was much better than an inverter and power brick. Since I live on a boat several months of the year every Amp-hour used to power a TV, computer or CPAP is paid for with annoying engine or generator running, so I take efficiency very seriously. What if John is right? Could I save 5 or 10 minutes charging time a day?
To resolve this I brought home all of my small inverters and put together a simple Amp Meter to test the load of my PRS1 560 APAP, which can run off of direct 12V. I immediately discovered that in normal use the load jumps from 0 to about 0.6 Amps on every breath. With an inverter it went from about .1 to 0.9 or 1.0, but it was clearly impossible to measure. Worse, I could vary the load by changing my breathing, so I needed a different approach.
I did this: I pulled the hose off the pump and let it run free. The load stabilized at 1.5 Amps on the DC supply. I then tried my three inverters (all 150 Watt modified sine wave) with the power brick. First was my 10 y/o Xantrex which I've used for TV, computers, etc. - it used 2.6 Amps. Next was a newer, small West marine unit that I use sparingly because I decided it was too cheap and had a noisy fan - it was 2.7 Amps. Last was a new Bestek that claimed in it's specs 90% efficiency - it was slightly better at 2.5 Amps. Running the numbers, I get the following results:
DC Load 1.5 Amps 100%
Xantrex 2.6 Amps 57%
West 2.7 Amps 55%
Bestek 2.5 Amps 60%
This is consistent with the report from Philips. I also tested a few other devices and got similar results. So where is the loss? The power brick is class "V" which means 85% according to some averaging formula, but it could easily be less than that at certain power levels. Similarly, inverters will list the max efficiency, usually at around 80-90% of full power, but can easily be much less at lower power.
So I stand by my claim that an inverter with power brick can use almost twice the power of a direct DC feed. What this means, of course, is that a battery will last almost twice as long with an direct DC cable. (I don't know the efficiency of the Resmed 12-24V converter, but I could believe its fairly high, enough to justify it $90 price if used frequently.) I would love to hear about any inverter that really has 90% efficiency over a wide ranges of loads.