Newbie on AVAPS
Re: Newbie on AVAPS
SWS,
Just make it simple - give your definition of PB in words we can all understand and that isn't qualified by excessive ifs, buts, maybes & perhaps
DSM
#2 Just adding that we know PB covers more than CSR - that was never in dispute, but CSR gives us the best description of PB. My Q above is
give us a better one.
Just make it simple - give your definition of PB in words we can all understand and that isn't qualified by excessive ifs, buts, maybes & perhaps
DSM
#2 Just adding that we know PB covers more than CSR - that was never in dispute, but CSR gives us the best description of PB. My Q above is
give us a better one.
xPAP and Quattro std mask (plus a pad-a-cheek anti-leak strap)
Re: Newbie on AVAPS
Doug, I honestly appreciate that humorous razzing.
Okay, let's make it a point to explore and discuss PB some more in the near future. But it's going to take me a while to catch up with off-line work before I can have an in-depth discussion of any kind. I look forward to a PB discussion!
Okay, let's make it a point to explore and discuss PB some more in the near future. But it's going to take me a while to catch up with off-line work before I can have an in-depth discussion of any kind. I look forward to a PB discussion!
Re: Newbie on AVAPS
-SWS wrote:Doug, I honestly appreciate that humorous razzing.
Okay, let's make it a point to explore and discuss PB some more in the near future. But it's going to take me a while to catch up with off-line work before I can have an in-depth discussion of any kind. I look forward to a PB discussion!
Steve,
Delighted
Doug
#2 PS - when we do discuss it - I will be seeking to clarify that because both SV machines address PB as CSR, I agree that in the past couple of years both Resmed and Respironics have expanded the target audience of the two machines to include CSDB - but complex sleep disordered breathing variants doesn't mean by default they fall in the PB category. Ye the machines can address CSDB because of its mechanisms for dealing with PB and Centrals. - Looking forward to future expansion on PB.
xPAP and Quattro std mask (plus a pad-a-cheek anti-leak strap)
Re: Newbie on AVAPS
[Pause in highly technical discussion for noob comment]
Just wanted to say thanks Doug for posting the info on PB and VB... and then a to SAG and SD for going and getting me all confused again
While all the technical details about volume and rate etc are above my head at the moment, I do find it informative to read your conclusion or summary statements. So don't stop your 10-pager debates for us noob's sakes
Snoredog - your theory on CA's is very interesting and I for one would certainly be interested in hearing more from the (medical) community about this line of reasoning.
So when are we going to talk about spontaneous arousals (perhaps causing irregular breathing) ??
[End noob comment and back to our regularly scheduled debate]
Just wanted to say thanks Doug for posting the info on PB and VB... and then a to SAG and SD for going and getting me all confused again
While all the technical details about volume and rate etc are above my head at the moment, I do find it informative to read your conclusion or summary statements. So don't stop your 10-pager debates for us noob's sakes
Snoredog - your theory on CA's is very interesting and I for one would certainly be interested in hearing more from the (medical) community about this line of reasoning.
So when are we going to talk about spontaneous arousals (perhaps causing irregular breathing) ??
[End noob comment and back to our regularly scheduled debate]
PR System One APAP, 10cm
Activa nasal mask + mouth taping w/ 3M micropore tape + Pap-cap + PADACHEEK + Pur-sleep
Hosehead since 31 July 2007, yippie!
Activa nasal mask + mouth taping w/ 3M micropore tape + Pap-cap + PADACHEEK + Pur-sleep
Hosehead since 31 July 2007, yippie!
Re: Newbie on AVAPS
Echo,echo wrote:[Pause in highly technical discussion for noob comment]
Just wanted to say thanks Doug for posting the info on PB and VB... and then a to SAG and SD for going and getting me all confused again
While all the technical details about volume and rate etc are above my head at the moment, I do find it informative to read your conclusion or summary statements. So don't stop your 10-pager debates for us noob's sakes
Snoredog - your theory on CA's is very interesting and I for one would certainly be interested in hearing more from the (medical) community about this line of reasoning.
So when are we going to talk about spontaneous arousals (perhaps causing irregular breathing) ??
[End noob comment and back to our regularly scheduled debate]
Thanks for the comment & don't let our ramblings here undermine your understanding of the PB VB description. The descriptions provided are good enough to stand for the moment.
SWS does raise some valid points & in time we should be able to iron them out. I do put my neck out a lot in trying to simplify topics as they can be very confusing - I take the view that drawing a line in the sand should attract enough reaction to ensure the line is in the right place. What I don't want to see is that the line becomes so fragmented that anyone seeking a line finds it got erased or turned into 10 lines pointing in different directions.
One good aspect of the discussions is that when we reach an agreed and understood consensus at least people can have a go at following how we got there. (this assumes we do reach something )
A lot of the difficulty we have in meanings is that many of us come at the topic from different directions & perspectives & we may all believe firmly we are coming from the right angle. A lot of the time I fall back on published docs from the vendors as they are the lowest common denominator & easiest to support even if the vendors have different names for the same thing (which they often do).
Cheers
DSM
#2 - Echo
for a PB definition (until we revise otherwise) go by this one from Respironics (see description at the bottom)
http://bipapautosv.respironics.com/
For a definition of Variable Breathing (until we revise otherwise) go by this one taken from the Respironics patent for their AUTO Cpap
[0159] H. Variable Breathing Control Layer
>>[0160] The Auto-CPAP controller, which is described in the next section, relies on the ability to trend the steady rhythmic breath patterns associated with certain stages of sleep. When a patient is awake, in REM sleep, or in distress, breathing tends to be more erratic and the Auto-CPAP trending becomes unstable. It is, therefore, important to interrupt the Auto-CPAP controller if the patient's breathing pattern becomes too variable. In essence, the variable breathing control layer keeps the Auto-CPAP control layer from being too erratic.<<
Plus this also taken from the patent for the Respironics AUTO-Cpap (and this is where SWS & I have room for interpretation )
>>the variable breathing control layer performs statistical analysis on the scatter of the trended weighted peak flow data to detect unstable breathing patterns or abrupt changes in patient response.<<
xPAP and Quattro std mask (plus a pad-a-cheek anti-leak strap)
Re: Newbie on AVAPS
No problem... I just now formally submitted your theory for peer review to this scientific committee.echo wrote:So when are we going to talk about spontaneous arousals (perhaps causing irregular breathing) ??
If I were in your shoes I'd start pecking away at the typewriter. ...Or if I was hard pressed for time, as the Belgish are often prone, I might even entertain the idea of cleverly disguising an old Nobel acceptance speech. Besides, recycling is very popular these days!
Plagiarism Tip Of the Day: Deceased Nobel laureates complain faaaaarr less than laureates still on the active lecture circuit.
Re: Newbie on AVAPS
Actually it is not a theory, it is actually what happens. As more and more doctors find ways to treat it, mfg's come out with more advanced machines, central apnea may become a thing of the past.echo wrote:[Pause in highly technical discussion for noob comment]
Hey who's thread is this anyway? Oh sorry Banned! (but we know he's taking a nap anyway)
They shouldn't be over your head, the volumes discussed are the volumes of air you inhale/exhale that make up a breath. If you count up the number of times you breath per minute that is your BPM (Breaths Per Minute). If you divide your avg. BPM by 60 seconds you come up with the total duration of each breath. If you divide that breath by 2 you have the time alloted for Inhale and the time alloted for exhale or I:E ratio.echo wrote: While all the technical details about volume and rate etc are above my head at the moment, I do find it informative to read your conclusion or summary statements. So don't stop your 10-pager debates for us noob's sakes
If everything is perfect you will inhale the proper amount of oxygen and exhale the proper amount of C02 on each breath.
Since the amount of CO2 retained in your blood controls breathing keeping some in your blood stream is vital. If you do more inhaling than you do exhaling (i.e. I:E ratio) you will have a higher rate of oxygen in your blood and a lower level of C02. Since the level of CO2 controls breathing your body won't like that level getting too low on C02. If it does and it cannot bring that level back up by manipulating how you breathe, it does the only thing it can do, stops you from breathing, hence the Central apnea. The cessation of breathing causes the level of CO2 in the blood to increase, when the level approaches what the brain determines as correct amount spontaneous breathing returns. If you overshoot that balance you are either Hypercapnia or Hypocapnia.
Since the body reacts to events if that respiration gets out of balance (i.e. more oxygen vs CO2) how can you control breathing to increase the level of C02 retained in the blood? One way is to slow your breathing down with each breath. If for example you were breathing at a Respiratory Rate of 20 per minute (RR=BPM), with each exhale you will expel or blow off a certain amount of CO2. If you cut that RR rate in half to 10 BPM, you now have 10 fewer exhales to exhaust CO2, as a result your body retains more CO2. Another way to accomplish that is use a mask that causes you to rebreathe more of your exhaled CO2, that will retain more CO2 and accomplish a similar feat. But carefully controlling your breathing is the best way to accomplish that.
Now when we talk about the peak (inhale volume) and tidal (exhale volume) together they are a breath. The volume found in each is measured in ml (milliliters).
This machine is actually quite simple.
1. Eliminate obstructive events with CPAP (EPAP pressure).
2. Control irregular breathing with Pressure support.
3. Control Centrals seen by slowing RR down with fixed backup settings.
So when you look at one of your breaths; put the time for inhale and exhale together, lets say together they add up to 6 seconds long. So over a minute's time you will take on avg. a breath every 10 seconds. Since each breath is 6 seconds long, put an imaginary separator line between them (3 seconds for inhale|3 second for exhale =6 second breath) which make up the BPM or Respiratory Rate. RR and BPM are the same thing, Respironics screwed the meaning of BPM by calling it backup mode on the SV, but it really is the same thing, number of breaths you take per minute.
Now understand on that 6 second breath (3 sec Inhale/3 sec Exhale) if you shift the center of that breath divider lets say from the center to the left you have 2 seconds for Inhale and 4 seconds for Exhale, breath still 6 seconds long. Doing this shift to the left we take in less oxygen and exhale more CO2. Ratio is now off, move it to the left another second's worth and you have 1 second inhale and 5 seconds exhale, again exhaling even more CO2 but also reducing the amount of oxygen taken in on inhale portion. So now that the ratio is off, your body attempts to compensate for the lack of oxygen (less time for obtaining it) by increasing the number of breaths you take per minute. So you start taking more rapid breaths at that same ratio. If you double up the number of breaths per minute, you turn that 1 second inspiration time into 2 seconds, but you also double the amount of exhalation which causes more CO2 to be blown off at a faster rate.
You might know this ratio of breathing as Hyperventilation. If this type of breathing continues where CO2 levels drops, your brain/body is going to say: "hey I am expelling too much C02 here and due to the shorter inhales I'm not getting enough Oxygen!" since CO2 level controls breathing it stops you from breathing (Central apnea). If the body cannot balance that oxygen/CO2 ratio out it does the only thing it can do it STOPs you from breathing. Unfortunately your O2 oxygen levels also drop which leads to hypoxia as seen on a pulse oximeter.
So I don't see Centrals as a neurological disorder, perfectly natural human body response to a breathing condition. Is your spinal cord cut? No. Do you have a brain disorder? No. Maybe you have slow circulation like from a failing heart and its not getting the blood to the part of the brain fast enough? While that is possible as well as other factors of respiration, in these discussions we assume normal heart and lung function but all of these variables and factors should be considered and/or ruled out in any finding. Other factors that can impact the immediate discussion is COPD, asthma or other disorders.
The particular ratio's quoted above are may/not exactly be what your body uses and examples given is to make it easier to understand, cause I'm dumber than a 5th grader. But you get the idea, I try to explain things so people can understand it. The more people that understand it the less often you have to repeat it.
echo wrote: Snoredog - your theory on CA's is very interesting and I for one would certainly be interested in hearing more from the (medical) community about this line of reasoning.
So when are we going to talk about spontaneous arousals (perhaps causing irregular breathing) ??
[End noob comment and back to our regularly scheduled debate]
SAG would have to explain those spontaneous micro arousals, those are still hocus-pocus to me. Theory is they are a result of resistive breathing caused by upper airway restrictions from the tongue on up (mainly your nasal passages). When your diaphragm comes up against resistance getting air in/out of your lungs it can generate a micro arousal. You can have nasal congestion, collapsing airway, resistance from vibratory snore etc. almost anything is thought to contribute to them. If they cannot correlate a limb/leg movement, an obstructive or central event to the arousal they label them as spontaneous.
Some doctors have a theory that you can titrate those resistive events out which make up the condition of UARS and make them spontaneous events a misnomer. Only problem is out of the existence of this message board and others I've yet to read a post by a single person who went to these doctors and all their spontaneous arousals were completely eliminated or the cause identified. Because once you identify the cause they are no longer spontaneous. But that is for another thread and besides, I cannot see those without an EEG.
someday science will catch up to what I'm saying...
Re: Newbie on AVAPS
Snoredog
Very good line of thinking and nicely put. I like it !
Just one comment though - where you wrote ...
>>>>
3. Control Centrals seen by slowing RR down with fixed backup settings.
<<<<
Did you actually mean
3. Control Centrals seen by slowing RR down with fixed ratios set for I:E in the backup settings.
DSM
Very good line of thinking and nicely put. I like it !
Just one comment though - where you wrote ...
>>>>
3. Control Centrals seen by slowing RR down with fixed backup settings.
<<<<
Did you actually mean
3. Control Centrals seen by slowing RR down with fixed ratios set for I:E in the backup settings.
DSM
xPAP and Quattro std mask (plus a pad-a-cheek anti-leak strap)
Re: Newbie on AVAPS
Door #1 on the Resp Adapt SV, that is what I have been trying to explain for some time now and going several pages back. BPM can be auto and it will be handled by the machine. But if you spend more and more time in Machine Triggered Breathing then you want to switch BPM=Auto to BPM=Spontaneous avg. BPM -2 and go with fixed settings. The reason is that rolling 4-minute sample it uses to establish BPM=Auto settings can become skewed if that sample period contains any PB. You see that spontaneous BPM average you got on your Encore report in spontaneous mode is your average. Now for controlling centrals you want to slow that RR down from your spontaneous to slow breathing down, by lowering the BPM by 2 that extends the time for I:E. By adjustment of IT time you adjust the ratio of I:E (select IT time, rest is for tidal volume). Of course in fixed mode you also have to provide the Rise Time which is a comfort setting.dsm wrote:Snoredog
Very good line of thinking and nicely put. I like it !
Just one comment though - where you wrote ...
>>>>
3. Control Centrals seen by slowing RR down with fixed backup settings.
<<<<
Did you actually mean
3. Control Centrals seen by slowing RR down with fixed ratios set for I:E in the backup settings.
DSM
Again, you don't use BPM or backup mode on the the machine very much. In your case last Patient Triggered Breathing was like 99.3% on your 11/19/2008 report. So you would only need BPM mode .7% of the time, not even 1% would you spend there. That means you have your spontaneous or SV side of the machine dialed in pretty darn good. I cannot see where changing your BPM mode is going to help any over Auto, machine is handling your breathing very well.
IF you did have say a lot more centrals and PTB started to drop, you could input fixed settings. You would take your 14.1 BPM seen and set BPM=12 (14.1 avg -2=12). Rise time would be what you determine for comfort. IT time should be set as close as possible to your spontaneous time (but that machine doesn't give that value in reports). It has to be in a range of .5 to 3 seconds. If you can determine that from other machines hey great.
But right now, I see no advantage on your machine by switching it from BPM=Auto. If you couldn't gain control over your breathing in SV mode (like Bev's) I would use fixed or Off until spontaneous is stabilized. With BPM=Off, the SV side should also be able to resolve central dysregulation through the control of breathing, it just takes longer that route is all. Using the BPM mode either fixed or Auto it takes care of those CA's in 2 to 6 breaths.
I haven't read up enough yet on Banned's AVAP machine yet to fully understand what they are targeting with that machine to comment on it. Just remember the BPM determines the total length of the breath per minute. The lower BPM used the longer each breath becomes in duration. What ratio you divide that up in depends on your breathing and the results seen. Can you shift it? Sure, with IT time. I think with the AVAPS they use average tidal volume and allow you to punch in what that will be. On this one you are only giving it BPM, IT and Rise Time. In BPM=Auto mode RR rate comes from spontaneous average, timings are automatic some determined by digital auto-track . Your 11/19 report looks great, don't change a thing.
someday science will catch up to what I'm saying...
- StillAnotherGuest
- Posts: 1005
- Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 6:43 pm
More Is Less (More Or Less...)
echo wrote:... and then a to SAG... for going and getting me all confused again
Omigod! And you're the voice of reason! We are doomed!! OK, what specifically has become confusing?
Meanwhile, I will try to re-summarize my points:
The only way to be reasonably sure (and not 100%, either) that your one-channel (airflow) device (xPAP machine) is seeing a central apnea is to employ a technology that can "look down" the open, unobstructed airway and identify it as such. And the only technology that is able to do that is ballistocardiography (the search for cardiac pulsations in GK420E) or forced oscillation technique (send out a pressure pulse and watch its behavior, looking for resistance in the oscillation as seen in SomnoStar). Any other machine cannot make this differentiation, all they see is a straight line.
In any ASV technology, therefore, all of the obstructive events must be manually titrated out. The apneas, absolutely. Theoretically, ASV technology will attack hypopnea, but why spend 4 times the money on something that doesn't do the job as well (because ASV technology never completely matches spontaneous breaths, it always undershoots to avoid the hyperventilation that perpetuates "central dysregulation").
If you arbitrarily stick in a backup rate in someone that does not have central apnea, you run the risk of hyperventilation and causing "central dysregulation". This is possible to do in pretty much everybody.
The breath rate is determined by an IPAP event. That makes this statement
absolutely and unequivocally false. Once a machine senses any inspiration, the rate is calculated.Snoredog wrote:If that hypopnea was central, there is NO inspiration, machine won't see that partial inspiration
This poster explained this inability of event differentiation without realizing it:
Snoredog wrote:How does it know it is central? Both events if they occur are displayed the same on the Therapy Flag graph, the only way you know which the machine "seen" is by its response, that being from the report was going to BPM mode seen as a dip on the Patient Triggered Breathing graph.
Snoredog wrote:Respironics wouldn't ask you as part of its titration protocol to input the CPAP pressure that eliminated all obstructive events if it meant otherwise. Since EPAP pressure is static on this machine, you better input the pressure that eliminates all obstructive events. So this means this machine is NOT going to respond to frank obstructive apnea period.
Snoredog wrote:if the machine detects an event resembling an apnea, that apnea has to be either obstructive or central or a combination of both. Since this machine only offers CPAP as baseline support and does NOT have the ability to adjust and respond on the fly therefor machine treats that event as a central by switching to BPM mode.
But in the case of obstruction the underlying issue is treated symptomatically and therefore inadequately.
SAG

Aromatherapy may help CPAP compliance. Lavender, Mandarin, Chamomile, and Sweet Marjoram aid in relaxation and sleep. Nature's Gift has these and a blend of all four called SleepEase.
Re: Newbie on AVAPS
Thanks for "undooming" us!In any ASV technology, therefore, all of the obstructive events must be manually titrated out. The apneas, absolutely. Theoretically, ASV technology will attack hypopnea, but why spend 4 times the money on something that doesn't do the job as well (because ASV technology never completely matches spontaneous breaths, it always undershoots to avoid the hyperventilation that perpetuates "central dysregulation").
Am I right inassuming you really mean "all of the obstructive events must be manually titrated out. The obstructive apneas, absolutely" in that sentence?
O.
_________________
Mask: AirFit™ P10 Nasal Pillow CPAP Mask with Headgear |
Additional Comments: Machine: Resmed AirSense10 for Her with Climateline heated hose ; alternating masks. |
And now here is my secret, a very simple secret; it is only with the heart that one can see rightly, what is essential is invisible to the eye.
Antoine de Saint-Exupery
Good advice is compromised by missing data
Forum member Dog Slobber Nov. 2023
Antoine de Saint-Exupery
Good advice is compromised by missing data
Forum member Dog Slobber Nov. 2023
- StillAnotherGuest
- Posts: 1005
- Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 6:43 pm
Re: Newbie on AVAPS
Absolutely.ozij wrote:Am I right in assuming you really mean "all of the obstructive events must be manually titrated out. The obstructive apneas, absolutely" in that sentence?
And again, ASV is not a good device to use to address obstruction in any form because of its pre-programmed undershoot.
Good Lord, 3 posts today, I won't be able to post again until Sunday.
SAG

Aromatherapy may help CPAP compliance. Lavender, Mandarin, Chamomile, and Sweet Marjoram aid in relaxation and sleep. Nature's Gift has these and a blend of all four called SleepEase.
Re: Newbie on AVAPS
Now how did that saying go ..... "Pray to the Lord, she will provide"....Good Lord, 3 posts today, I won't be able to post again until Sunday.
Something like that.
O.
_________________
Mask: AirFit™ P10 Nasal Pillow CPAP Mask with Headgear |
Additional Comments: Machine: Resmed AirSense10 for Her with Climateline heated hose ; alternating masks. |
And now here is my secret, a very simple secret; it is only with the heart that one can see rightly, what is essential is invisible to the eye.
Antoine de Saint-Exupery
Good advice is compromised by missing data
Forum member Dog Slobber Nov. 2023
Antoine de Saint-Exupery
Good advice is compromised by missing data
Forum member Dog Slobber Nov. 2023
- StillAnotherGuest
- Posts: 1005
- Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 6:43 pm
Re: Newbie on AVAPS
Well, I certainly wouldn't want to bother Her with something like this, since She's probably very busy with all that laundry and cooking to do!ozij wrote:Now how did that saying go ..... "Pray to the Lord, she will provide"....Good Lord, 3 posts today, I won't be able to post again until Sunday.
SAG

Aromatherapy may help CPAP compliance. Lavender, Mandarin, Chamomile, and Sweet Marjoram aid in relaxation and sleep. Nature's Gift has these and a blend of all four called SleepEase.
Re: Newbie on AVAPS
Not to worry. She's omnipotent.
O.
O.
_________________
Mask: AirFit™ P10 Nasal Pillow CPAP Mask with Headgear |
Additional Comments: Machine: Resmed AirSense10 for Her with Climateline heated hose ; alternating masks. |
And now here is my secret, a very simple secret; it is only with the heart that one can see rightly, what is essential is invisible to the eye.
Antoine de Saint-Exupery
Good advice is compromised by missing data
Forum member Dog Slobber Nov. 2023
Antoine de Saint-Exupery
Good advice is compromised by missing data
Forum member Dog Slobber Nov. 2023