Aura and Autopap

General Discussion on any topic relating to CPAP and/or Sleep Apnea.
Paul B
Posts: 293
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 10:15 am

Aura and Autopap

Post by Paul B » Wed Mar 23, 2005 6:23 pm

I just received my Aura and will try it out tonight with my Resmed Spirit. Does anyone know why in the instruction booklet they say it can be used with a BiPAP or CPAP but not with an Autopap? Just curious what the reasoning might be.

Paul

_________________
Machine

User avatar
wading thru the muck!
Posts: 2799
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 11:42 am

Post by wading thru the muck! » Wed Mar 23, 2005 6:31 pm

Paul,

Read back a few threads and look at the ones with aura in the subject. There has been lots of discussion on the topic. The aura/spirit combination has been used by others with no problems, so you should be OK. Good question though.
Sincerely,
wading thru the muck of the sleep study/DME/Insurance money pit!

Paul B
Posts: 293
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 10:15 am

Post by Paul B » Wed Mar 23, 2005 6:35 pm

Hi wader,

I did see those messages, but I'm curious why Aeiomed says not to use the Aura with an Autopap, but it's okay to use with a BiPAP or CPAP. I'm just trying to understand what the rationale is.

Paul

_________________
Machine

User avatar
rested gal
Posts: 12881
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 10:14 pm
Location: Tennessee

Post by rested gal » Wed Mar 23, 2005 6:37 pm

Paul, I think it has to do with the possibility - not certainty - that an autopap might not be able to detect events properly (or might think it is detecting something that's really not there) when the air flow characteristics change going through a narrow diameter hose (the narrow connector tube on some masks), or through other narrow tubes in some nasal pillows interfaces.

I take it as a caution - to be looked at by each individual. Things looked fine for me, AHI-wise, using narrow diameter connector hose masks with any autopap I've tried. Probably most people can mix and match with no trouble. I suppose the companies' cautionary "not recommended" statement is there for "just in case" - to cover themselves for the few patients whose autopaps might misread what's happening with their particular breathing and that particular change in airflow...just my guess, and I'm no doctor!

Paul B
Posts: 293
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 10:15 am

Post by Paul B » Wed Mar 23, 2005 9:58 pm

Thanks for the hypothesis, RG; you could be very right. I'm just really curious about it and it's got me stumped so I'll give them a call tomorrow and see if I can get an answer. I'll post it here when I find out.

_________________
Machine

User avatar
wading thru the muck!
Posts: 2799
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 11:42 am

Post by wading thru the muck! » Wed Mar 23, 2005 10:28 pm

Paul,

The only auto machine that does not caution against using a narrow tube interface is the Puritan Bennett 420E. Not coincindentaly their premier interface is the narrow tube Puritan Bennett Breeze.
Sincerely,
wading thru the muck of the sleep study/DME/Insurance money pit!