Jeff,jnk wrote:Cool. So if we're being blunt, I'll just say that I have no idea what you are talking about or how it relates even remotely to my post.dsm wrote:JNK
I am going to be blunt & say that DreamDiver's reality far exceeds your comments and theory about a machine you don't have & haven't tried.
I am amused at the extent of the critical analysis of the S9 by someone who is in reality describing a phantom and who has no need to buy
the new machine anyway. But keep it coming. It is insightful in other ways
DSM
But it was nice hearing from you.
jeff
In the link I posted (to one of DreamDiver's threads), there is a lot of detail that shows what an S9 does & how long it does it for right down to seeing the wave form of the FOT pulses. My point is DreamDiver is showing us what really happens. He has done quite a few excellent, informative & analytical threads on what he is seeing from his own machine. Your critiques & solicitations as to why you wouldn't want one seem be unrelated to the reality we can extract from DreamDivers thread.
Just as an added comment, I would consider that if I went into any theoretical analysis of the PR1 or the new F&P machine & used my theorizing as reasons I wouldn't want one, I would be very fairly open to challenge as to what my purpose was. I readily comment on the ASV machines because I have used the 2 main brands for 2 years and feel I can add value to discussion on the machine. What value are you adding re the S9 ? (value in the sense of informed feedback)
Cheers
DSM