zoocrewphoto wrote:But as I pointed out - that message WAS NOT THERE when I posted my statement and question. You act like it was, and it was NOT. We were probably both typing our posts at the same time. Yours happened to hit the list just before mine, but I could not see it. On my laptop, when I click on submit, it will show any new posts that have been added since I started typing. It does not do that on my ipod.
So, I would have seen your post the next time I went to the thread. I would have seen it on my own. I don't need a sarcastic comment telling me to go read your post. I have no idea why you seem to enjoy being rude to certain people, me being one of them. You have some great posts sometimes, but it is difficult to appreciate you when you act superior.
we all have perceptions of things, I cannot change yours, no matter how much I may think they're in error.
that was not sarcasm. it was a very direct point to address the compleatly reasonable assumption that you could very well start reading the thread at the post you'd made, and going forward, given that if one clicks the little read marker on the thread from the front page, it goes to posts NEWER than the last post you saw, which, by definition, would be your own post.
now that you've made this all about you, have you learned anything useful about leak lines on PRS1 machines, or, do you (as I suspect) simply not care? (now, that, one might argue, IS sarcasm)
Get OSCAR
Accounts to put on the foe list: dataq1, clownbell, gearchange, lynninnj, mper!?, DreamDiver, Geer1, almostadoctor, sleepgeek, ajack, stom, mogy, D.H., They often post misleading, timewasting stuff.
