McSleepy wrote:It seems like you do get it, which is exactly why you are skirting the issue - not in this thread, take any other, you never back to such extent any of the multitude of statements you make;
I'm quite happy to provide reference, for example, the other day when I alleged that the climateline max larger heated hose for resmeds was introduced for bilevel users at higher pressures, and Pugsy called me on it, so I did a bit of digging and provided the humidifier accessory page from resmed where it says just that,
that's how it works, I made an allegation, someone doubted it, and I did not do like you've done here and simply repeat myself over and over,
I provided substantiating evidence. you have not.
McSleepy wrote:yet your only argument is "go prove it in excruciating detail".
no, my "argument" is that I don't believe that your theory holds water, I don't believe that the principles you've tossed around would have a meaningful effect on therapy.... and you've done
nothing to show that they would. a simple calculation to support your hypothesis is not "excruciating detail".
McSleepy wrote:I don't have time to go down to middle-school science and write dissertations - no one is going to do that - just because you asked. That is pure destructive behavior.
no, that's *science* you propose a hypothesis and then you provide evidence to back it up. unless you're just too lazy, or you *can't* back it up.
Get OSCAR
Accounts to put on the foe list: dataq1, clownbell, gearchange, lynninnj, mper!?, DreamDiver, Geer1, almostadoctor, sleepgeek, ajack, stom, mogy, D.H., They often post misleading, timewasting stuff.