jnk... wrote:... at what time...?

Maybe about Noon-1:00, but it's like who knows. I'll keep an eye out tho.

If you're buying, a water bottle refill will be fine for me.

Once again you people are going to block my car into the garage and tie up traffic to the point that I may have to take the subway to my meeting that day. So the bottom line is, Jeff's Hospitality House is... well, not. Guess I'll have to fill up at the Con Ed Rest Stop. Raisins and bananas. My fav...

jnk... wrote:But people such as -SWS, Rested Gal, and ozij, just to name a few, make a lasting difference, I think, here or not.

I feel so left out!

Then again, maybe not.

Hoping to see you Sunday.

Wulfman... wrote:Now THIS is my idea of a "tablet"..........

I find these better able to stand up to normal wear and tear:

Encore 1.8 will D/L serial data.

So I guess applying Flow Limitation Values to Waveform Analysis would be a little "Over The Top" then? By all means, sir So instead, as the specter of chiliaphobia raises its ugly head, I'll leave you with A blonde is watching the news with her husband when the newscaster says "Two Brazilian men di...

...after seeing that first Oregon drive, and if somebody told me Ohio State was going to have 4 turnovers, that the Ducks were going to get blown out, I would've said they were crazy...

...boy, I tell ya--

that Rubber Soul is just a great album...

...back to cleaning out the Nano...

Do you mean that the level is normal? Although it's true, it maybe higher than level without cpap...or maybe im too sensitive in co2. That's why i can not tell that this isn't co2 problem. (Or maybe it's not co2 problem though i have dizzy, fatigue that can be caused by co2. i want to know other va...

Oh well----- I guess I don't have enough posts left to run that discussion very long anyway...

So I guess applying Flow Limitation Values to Waveform Analysis would be a little "Over The Top" then?

So with the above in mind, in re: Sludge who knows what he's talking about says you should try to keep FL under .4. Sludge did not say exactly that. Rather, he said: I also don't remember if Sludge said 0.4...but if he did say that...I would probably still primarily look at 95%. If it was below 0.4 ...

The new analysis was more than simply waveform shape analysis: 1) as flattening severity increases (e.g., the shape index decreases) the FFL measure increases, 2) where flattening is occurring and ventilation is decreasing, the FFL measure is even more severe, and 3) where ventilation is high (e.g.,...

It appeared to be more than a flip and label change as the analysis went from "FL" to "FFL". This was discovered by LoQ who presented

Fuzzy Flow Limitation